Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,339 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln Village Eviction Risk: High , Carson

Tract 06037572301 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,728 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 06037572301 sits in the Lincoln Village area of Long Beach eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.7/10. Population here is 3,728. The severe-burden share is 36%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
9.7
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 21% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units937
Renter share42.0%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate19.6%
Median income$90,972

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Lincoln Village
Very High
Within parent city
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#47 of 112 tracts In Carson
Elevated
Within county
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#815 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#1,125 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Carson and the region

Centroid at 33.8223, -118.2212 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln Village scores 9.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Carson
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.6% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
$1,814 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Carson
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Carson
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Carson
8.5

How Lincoln Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.79.7This tracttract 572301Carson: 6.76.7Carsonparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Village

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9/10. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. Food insecurity runs 29.7% against 17.8% nationally.

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. The poverty rate is 20%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Housing insecurity runs 23.2% against 14.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #2,339 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.8/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for roughly one in two of renters. Average gross rent is $1,814, close to the Long Beach average.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037572301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037572301?

Census tract 06037572301 in the Lincoln Village neighborhood scores 9.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037572301?

Median gross rent is $1,814/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037572301?

19.6% of residents in tract 06037572301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,728.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037572301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 53th, minority 93th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 06037572301 considered part of Lincoln Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037572301 fall within Lincoln Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037572301 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037572301 compare to Carson overall?

Tract 06037572301 scores 9.7/10, higher than the parent city of Carson at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Carson; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037572301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Carson

Top eight tracts in Carson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related