Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,797 of 84,120 nationally

Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach

Tract 06037573002 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,761 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

With a score of 9.1/10, tract 06037573002 in the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,761. This is renter territory: 89% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Risk score
9.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 55% Stable renters 34% Owners 11%
Tract context
Occupied units1,034
Renter share89.0%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$59,560

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 32 tracts In Cambodia Town
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#57 of 112 tracts In Long Beach
Moderate
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#1,073 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#1,681 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7935, -118.1915 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cambodia Town scores 9.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,583 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Beach
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Beach
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5

How Cambodia Town compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cambodia Town risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.19.1This tracttract 573002Long Beach: 9.19.1Long Beachparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10. Housing insecurity runs 33.3% against 14.2% nationally.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. 22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.4/10.

62% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Adults with no health insurance runs 21.9% against 11.3% nationally. At $1,583 a month, rents run 15% under what the rest of Long Beach commands.

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037573002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037573002?

Census tract 06037573002 in the Cambodia Town neighborhood scores 9.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037573002?

Median gross rent is $1,583/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037573002?

5.6% of residents in tract 06037573002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,761.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037573002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 68th, minority 94th, housing 63th.
Q5

Is tract 06037573002 considered part of Cambodia Town?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037573002 fall within Cambodia Town (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037573002 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037573002 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037573002 scores 9.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Long Beach at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037573002 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 31% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related