Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,529 of 84,120 nationally

Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach

Tract 06037573202 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 6,654 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 06037573202 sits in the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.2/10. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9/10.

Risk score
9.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 33% Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,693
Renter share62.9%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate12.0%
Median income$78,771

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 32 tracts In Cambodia Town
Very Low
Within parent city
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#55 of 112 tracts In Long Beach
Moderate
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#1,032 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#1,536 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7935, -118.1850 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cambodia Town scores 9.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.0% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,687 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Beach
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Beach
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5

How Cambodia Town compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cambodia Town risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.29.2This tracttract 573202Long Beach: 9.19.1Long Beachparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.4/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Housing insecurity runs 25.8% against 14.2% nationally. about half of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. It sits 0.8 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Adults with no health insurance runs 18.6% against 11.3% nationally. At $1,687 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Long Beach commands.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #3,529 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037573202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037573202?

Census tract 06037573202 in the Cambodia Town neighborhood scores 9.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037573202?

Median gross rent is $1,687/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037573202?

12.0% of residents in tract 06037573202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,654.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037573202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 73th, minority 96th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 06037573202 considered part of Cambodia Town?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037573202 fall within Cambodia Town (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037573202 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037573202 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037573202 scores 9.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Long Beach at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037573202 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 90% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related