Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally
Rolling Hills Estates Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 06037670406 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,727
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06037670406 (Rolling Hills Estates, California) comes in at 5.9/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #22,676 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
64% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $3,501 a month against an average household income of $217,917 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 8% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units597
Renter share7.9%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate7.2%
Median income$217,917
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
1
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
5
th percentile
Very Low
National
27
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rolling Hills Estates and the region
Centroid at 33.7631, -118.3853 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rolling Hills Estates scores 2.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rolling Hills Estates
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.2% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rolling Hills Estates
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rolling Hills Estates
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rolling Hills Estates
4.6
How Rolling Hills Estates compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 22
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 18%Socioeconomic
- 57%Household composition
- 76%Racial/ethnic minority
- 10%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.2%Housing insecurity
- 2.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.7%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 3.8%Transit barriers
- 2.6%No health insurance
- 10.4%Frequent mental distress
- 22.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills Estates
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 8.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rolling Hills Estates, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 5.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is Asian and White and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037670406
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670406?
Census tract 06037670406 in Rolling Hills Estates scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037670406?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670406?
7.2% of residents in tract 06037670406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,727.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670406?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 57th, minority 76th, housing 10th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06037670406 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06037670406 compare to Rolling Hills Estates overall?
Tract 06037670406 scores 2.8/10, lower than the parent city of Rolling Hills Estates at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rolling Hills Estates; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rolling Hills Estates
Top eight tracts in Rolling Hills Estates ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related