Palos Verdes Estates Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06037670413 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,852 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
With a score of 5.5/10, tract 06037670413 in the Palos Verdes Estates area of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,852. It sits 2.9 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Palos Verdes Estates and the region
Centroid at 33.7726, -118.3975 · click any tract to drill in
Why Palos Verdes Estates scores 5.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Palos Verdes Estates compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 25
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 44%Household composition
- 72%Racial/ethnic minority
- 32%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 7%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Palos Verdes Estates. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.1%Housing insecurity
- 2.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.9%Food insecurity
- 4.1%SNAP enrollment
- 3.6%Transit barriers
- 2.7%No health insurance
- 10.2%Frequent mental distress
- 22.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Palos Verdes Estates
The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.3/10.
The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 4.1% against 15.2% nationally.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. 59% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 72% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 25% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 3.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037670413
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670413?
What is the average rent in tract 06037670413?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670413?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670413?
Is tract 06037670413 considered part of Palos Verdes Estates?
What share of households in tract 06037670413 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037670413 compare to Palos Verdes Estates overall?
Was tract 06037670413 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Palos Verdes Estates
Top eight tracts in Palos Verdes Estates ranked by composite eviction-risk score.