Neighborhood · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Hamer Eviction Risk: Lower , Placentia

Tract 06059021809 · Orange, CA · pop 3,126 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Tract 06059021809, home to 3,126 residents in the Hamer neighborhood of Placentia, scores 5.3/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 51% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 49% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,860 monthly, set against $138,832 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 26% of occupied homes.

Risk score

2.5

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 13% Owners 74%

Tract context

Occupied units1,037

Renter share26.0%

SVI overall0.33

Poverty rate5.7%

Median income$138,832

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Placentia and the region

Centroid at 33.8952, -117.8357 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hamer scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Placentia

5.9

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

5.5

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

5.7% poverty · this tract

1.4

Supply constraint

$1,860 rent vs county FMR

1.4

Rent control risk

Inherited from Placentia

7.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.6

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Placentia

4.2

Housing court bias

Inherited from Placentia

5.2

How Hamer compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

13%Socioeconomic
54%Household composition
63%Racial/ethnic minority
48%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hamer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.9%Housing insecurity
4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
10.1%Food insecurity
8.3%SNAP enrollment
5.9%Transit barriers
5.8%No health insurance
15.4%Frequent mental distress
27.8%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hamer

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Placentia, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Orange County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 33rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059021809

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059021809?

Census tract 06059021809 in the Hamer neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06059021809?

Median gross rent is $1,860/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059021809?

5.7% of residents in tract 06059021809 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,126.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059021809?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 54th, minority 63th, housing 48th.

Is tract 06059021809 considered part of Hamer?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059021809 fall within Hamer (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06059021809 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06059021809 compare to Placentia overall?

Tract 06059021809 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Placentia at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Placentia; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Placentia

Top eight tracts in Placentia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.