Within neighborhood
80
th percentile
High
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally
Hamer Eviction Risk: Lower , Placentia
Tract 06059011715 · Orange, CA · pop 7,296 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06059011715 (the Hamer area of Placentia, California) comes in at 5.7/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #28,521 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 60% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 44% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,303 a month while the average household earns $104,917 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units2,499
Renter share34.6%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate4.3%
Median income$104,917
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
37
th percentile
Low
Within state
21
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Placentia and the region
Centroid at 33.8824, -117.8529 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hamer scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Placentia
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.3% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,303 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Placentia
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Placentia
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Placentia
6.5
How Hamer compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 34
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 33%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 57%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hamer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.1%Housing insecurity
- 4.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.2%Food insecurity
- 7.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.3%Transit barriers
- 5.5%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 26.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hamer
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Placentia, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 34th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059011715
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059011715?
Census tract 06059011715 in the Hamer neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059011715?
Median gross rent is $2,303/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059011715?
4.3% of residents in tract 06059011715 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,296.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059011715?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 33th, minority 60th, housing 57th.
Q5
Is tract 06059011715 considered part of Hamer?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059011715 fall within Hamer (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059011715 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059011715 compare to Placentia overall?
Tract 06059011715 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Placentia at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Placentia; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Placentia
Top eight tracts in Placentia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
5.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
4.5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Hamer
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
06059021821
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Hamer
3.7
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Hamer
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Related