Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally

Hamer Eviction Risk: Moderate , Placentia

Tract 06059011710 · Orange, CA · pop 4,033 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of 5.6/10, tract 06059011710 in the Hamer area of Placentia, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,033. The severe-burden share is 37%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 4% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,190
Renter share8.3%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate3.2%
Median income$145,476

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Hamer
Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 11 tracts In Placentia
Very Low
Within county
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#539 of 613 tracts In Orange
Very Low
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#7,670 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Placentia and the region

Centroid at 33.8924, -117.8625 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hamer scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Placentia
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,508 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Placentia
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Placentia
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Placentia
6.5

How Hamer compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hamer risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.6This tracttract 0117106.9Placentiaparent city7.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 18

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hamer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hamer

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.3/10.

Against the Orange County average of 7.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.4 points. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.6/10.

SNAP participation runs 6.9% against 15.2% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

That is riskier than roughly 73% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.9 points cooler.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059011710

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059011710?

Census tract 06059011710 in the Hamer neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06059011710?

Median gross rent is $2,508/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059011710?

3.2% of residents in tract 06059011710 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,033.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059011710?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 9th, minority 70th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 06059011710 considered part of Hamer?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059011710 fall within Hamer (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06059011710 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06059011710 compare to Placentia overall?

Tract 06059011710 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Placentia at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Placentia; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Placentia

Top eight tracts in Placentia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related