Within neighborhood
88
th percentile
High
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally
Acacia Knolls Eviction Risk: High , Laguna Hills
Tract 06059032014 · Orange, CA · pop 6,230 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Tract 06059032014 sits in the Acacia Knolls area of Lake Forest, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8/10. Population here is 6,230. Severe burden reaches 40%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 10%
Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,971
Renter share31.3%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate22.7%
Median income$77,891
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
73
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
61
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Laguna Hills and the region
Centroid at 33.6165, -117.6974 · click any tract to drill in
Why Acacia Knolls scores 8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Laguna Hills
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.7% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$2,367 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Laguna Hills
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Laguna Hills
6.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Laguna Hills
6.2
How Acacia Knolls compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 92
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 68%Socioeconomic
- 68%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 100%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Acacia Knolls. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.8%Housing insecurity
- 8.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.8%Food insecurity
- 19.0%SNAP enrollment
- 10.7%Transit barriers
- 14.8%No health insurance
- 17.1%Frequent mental distress
- 38.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Acacia Knolls
Against Orange County at 51.8%, 67% of renters here are cost-burdened. Set annual rent against average income of $77,891 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 7.9/10. The poverty rate is 23%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Against the Orange County average of 7.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. At $2,367 a month, rents run 11% under what the rest of Lake Forest commands. On the national scale it lands near the 91st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
The legal-climate inputs (statute speed, court posture, rent-regulation exposure) come from Lake Forest as a whole. Only the economic and supply signals are measured inside this tract. Social vulnerability reads 9.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. 31% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059032014
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059032014?
Census tract 06059032014 in the Acacia Knolls neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059032014?
Median gross rent is $2,367/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059032014?
22.7% of residents in tract 06059032014 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,230.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059032014?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 68th, minority 75th, housing 100th.
Q5
Is tract 06059032014 considered part of Acacia Knolls?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059032014 fall within Acacia Knolls (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059032014 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059032014 compare to Laguna Hills overall?
Tract 06059032014 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Laguna Hills at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Laguna Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Laguna Hills
Top eight tracts in Laguna Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Upper Greenridge
7.9
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Grandview Crest
6.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Lower Heatherview
6.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Woodside
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Lake Park West
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Lake Park West
5.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Sycamore Creek
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Park Place Ranchwood
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Related