Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally
Acacia Knolls Eviction Risk: High , Laguna Hills
Tract 06059062646 · Orange, CA · pop 3,233 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 8.1/10, tract 06059062646 in the Acacia Knolls area of Laguna Woods, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,233. 74% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 2%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,413
Renter share21.5%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$60,465
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
74
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
62
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Laguna Hills and the region
Centroid at 33.6069, -117.7161 · click any tract to drill in
Why Acacia Knolls scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Laguna Hills
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$2,167 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Laguna Hills
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Laguna Hills
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Laguna Hills
7.6
How Acacia Knolls compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 48
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 51%Socioeconomic
- 71%Household composition
- 46%Racial/ethnic minority
- 28%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Acacia Knolls. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 3.6%Housing insecurity
- 2.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.4%Food insecurity
- 5.6%SNAP enrollment
- 3.5%Transit barriers
- 3.1%No health insurance
- 9.4%Frequent mental distress
- 38.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Acacia Knolls
Against Orange County at 51.8%, 89% of renters here are cost-burdened. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $60,465 and the ratio lands at 43%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Running cool, economic stress reads 2.2/10. Food insecurity runs 6.4% against 17.8% nationally.
Running hot, housing-court posture reads 7.6/10. Against the Orange County average of 7.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Nationally it ranks #7,382 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 21% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.3/10.
Average gross rent is $2,167, close to the Laguna Woods average.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059062646
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059062646?
Census tract 06059062646 in the Acacia Knolls neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059062646?
Median gross rent is $2,167/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 89% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059062646?
8.8% of residents in tract 06059062646 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,233.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059062646?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 71th, minority 46th, housing 28th.
Q5
Is tract 06059062646 considered part of Acacia Knolls?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059062646 fall within Acacia Knolls (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059062646 struggle to pay rent?
About 3.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059062646 compare to Laguna Hills overall?
Tract 06059062646 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Laguna Hills at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Laguna Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Laguna Hills
Top eight tracts in Laguna Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related