Portola Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Lake Forest
Tract 06059052428 · Orange, CA · pop 6,640 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Eviction risk in Portola Hills in Lake Forest centers on tract 06059052428, which scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 6,640 residents. It lands near the 66th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 70% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,932 monthly, set against $161,780 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 12% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lake Forest and the region
Centroid at 33.6798, -117.6332 · click any tract to drill in
Why Portola Hills scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Portola Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 5
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 17%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 2%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Portola Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.1%Housing insecurity
- 4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.5%Food insecurity
- 6.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 4.4%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 21.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Portola Hills
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lake Forest, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 5th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 06059052428
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059052428?
What is the average rent in tract 06059052428?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059052428?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059052428?
Is tract 06059052428 considered part of Portola Hills?
What share of households in tract 06059052428 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06059052428 compare to Lake Forest overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Lake Forest
Top eight tracts in Lake Forest ranked by composite eviction-risk score.