Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Crestmore Eviction Risk: Moderate , Jurupa Valley
Tract 06065040101 · Riverside, CA · pop 3,804 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
06065040101 is a census tract in the Crestmore area of Jurupa Valley, CA. It scores 5.8/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,804 residents. Against Riverside County at 53.8%, 33% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units956
Renter share18.6%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$106,591
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
19
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
31
th percentile
Low
Within state
19
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Jurupa Valley and the region
Centroid at 34.0228, -117.3965 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crestmore scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Jurupa Valley
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,184 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Jurupa Valley
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Jurupa Valley
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Jurupa Valley
6.9
How Crestmore compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 72
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 67%Socioeconomic
- 73%Household composition
- 91%Racial/ethnic minority
- 49%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.8%Housing insecurity
- 9.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 25.5%Food insecurity
- 18.7%SNAP enrollment
- 12.2%Transit barriers
- 18.3%No health insurance
- 18.0%Frequent mental distress
- 36.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crestmore
The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10. Average gross rent is $1,184, 32% below the Jurupa Valley average.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.9/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8/10.
11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Housing insecurity runs 22.8% against 14.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 25.5% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 0.8 points below the Riverside County average of 6.6.
That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $106,591, annual rent is just 13%.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065040101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065040101?
Census tract 06065040101 in the Crestmore neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065040101?
Median gross rent is $1,184/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065040101?
7.8% of residents in tract 06065040101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,804.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065040101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 67th, household 73th, minority 91th, housing 49th.
Q5
Is tract 06065040101 considered part of Crestmore?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065040101 fall within Crestmore (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06065040101 struggle to pay rent?
About 22.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06065040101 compare to Jurupa Valley overall?
Tract 06065040101 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Jurupa Valley at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Jurupa Valley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Jurupa Valley
Top eight tracts in Jurupa Valley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related