Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Twin Palms Eviction Risk: Moderate , Palm Springs

Tract 06065044805 · Riverside, CA · pop 1,628 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Eviction risk in the Twin Palms area of Palm Springs centers on tract 06065044805, which scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 1,628 residents. It lands near the 86th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 59% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,452 a month while the average household earns $98,000 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 9% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units970
Renter share22.6%
SVI overall0.49
Poverty rate8.9%
Median income$98,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Twin Palms
Very Low
Within parent city
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 17 tracts In Palm Springs
Very Low
Within county
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#171 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Elevated
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#4,126 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Palm Springs and the region

Centroid at 33.8050, -116.5369 · click any tract to drill in

Why Twin Palms scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Palm Springs
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.9% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,452 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palm Springs
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palm Springs
7.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palm Springs
7.6

How Twin Palms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Twin Palms risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 044805Palm Springs: 8.38.3Palm Springsparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 49

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Twin Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Twin Palms

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Palm Springs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 49th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065044805

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044805?

Census tract 06065044805 in the Twin Palms neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065044805?

Median gross rent is $1,452/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044805?

8.9% of residents in tract 06065044805 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,628.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044805?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 49th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 22th, minority 39th, housing 87th.
Q5

Is tract 06065044805 considered part of Twin Palms?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065044805 fall within Twin Palms (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06065044805 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06065044805 compare to Palm Springs overall?

Tract 06065044805 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Palm Springs at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palm Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Palm Springs

Top eight tracts in Palm Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related