Twin Palms Eviction Risk: Moderate , Palm Springs
Tract 06065044805 · Riverside, CA · pop 1,628 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Eviction risk in the Twin Palms area of Palm Springs centers on tract 06065044805, which scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 1,628 residents. It lands near the 86th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 59% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,452 a month while the average household earns $98,000 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Palm Springs and the region
Centroid at 33.8050, -116.5369 · click any tract to drill in
Why Twin Palms scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Twin Palms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 49
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 34%Socioeconomic
- 22%Household composition
- 39%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Twin Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.5%Food insecurity
- 5.4%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 4.1%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 29.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Twin Palms
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Palm Springs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 49th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 06065044805
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044805?
What is the average rent in tract 06065044805?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044805?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044805?
Is tract 06065044805 considered part of Twin Palms?
What share of households in tract 06065044805 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06065044805 compare to Palm Springs overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Palm Springs
Top eight tracts in Palm Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.