Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,153 of 84,120 nationally
Twin Palms Eviction Risk: Elevated , Palm Springs
Tract 06065940800 · Riverside, CA · pop 2,882 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 06065940800 covers part of the Twin Palms area of Palm Springs, CA, and scores 7.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,882 residents. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
7.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,876
Renter share20.1%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$77,424
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
31
th percentile
Low
Within county
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
48
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Palm Springs and the region
Centroid at 33.7941, -116.5369 · click any tract to drill in
Why Twin Palms scores 7.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Palm Springs
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,679 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palm Springs
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palm Springs
7.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palm Springs
7.6
How Twin Palms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 59
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 48%Socioeconomic
- 56%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 76%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Twin Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.4%Food insecurity
- 6.4%SNAP enrollment
- 4.5%Transit barriers
- 4.5%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 33.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Twin Palms
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.7/10. Against Riverside County at 53.8%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2/10.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.3/10. Food insecurity runs 7.4% against 17.8% nationally.
Housing insecurity runs 6.2% against 14.2% nationally. Against the Riverside County average of 6.6, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points. Nationally it ranks #11,153 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 6.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,679, close to the Palm Springs average.
Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $77,424.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065940800
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065940800?
Census tract 06065940800 in the Twin Palms neighborhood scores 7.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065940800?
Median gross rent is $1,679/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065940800?
8.2% of residents in tract 06065940800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,882.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065940800?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 56th, minority 30th, housing 76th.
Q5
Is tract 06065940800 considered part of Twin Palms?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065940800 fall within Twin Palms (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06065940800 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06065940800 compare to Palm Springs overall?
Tract 06065940800 scores 7.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Palm Springs at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palm Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Palm Springs
Top eight tracts in Palm Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
06065941001
8.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Warm Sands
8.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06065044605
8.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
El Mirador
8.5
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Warm Sands
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Little Beverly Hills
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
El Mirador
7.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
El Mirador
7.7
/ 10 · High
Related