Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally
Willow Springs Eviction Risk: Lower , Folsom
Tract 06067008507 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,865 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Tract 06067008507, home to 3,865 residents in the Willow Springs area of Folsom, scores 5.9/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 73% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 50% of renter households, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,431 a month against an average household income of $126,496 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,525
Renter share43.6%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$126,496
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
53
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
4
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
4
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Folsom and the region
Centroid at 38.6506, -121.1293 · click any tract to drill in
Why Willow Springs scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Folsom
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,431 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Folsom
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Folsom
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Folsom
4.5
How Willow Springs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 26%Socioeconomic
- 26%Household composition
- 68%Racial/ethnic minority
- 27%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.2%Housing insecurity
- 5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.7%Food insecurity
- 8.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.1%Transit barriers
- 4.9%No health insurance
- 15.7%Frequent mental distress
- 23.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Willow Springs
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 2.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Folsom, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008507
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008507?
Census tract 06067008507 in the Willow Springs neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067008507?
Median gross rent is $2,431/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008507?
2.5% of residents in tract 06067008507 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,865.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008507?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 26th, minority 68th, housing 27th.
Q5
Is tract 06067008507 considered part of Willow Springs?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067008507 fall within Willow Springs (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067008507 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067008507 compare to Folsom overall?
Tract 06067008507 scores 2.6/10, lower than the parent city of Folsom at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Folsom; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Folsom
Top eight tracts in Folsom ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Lexington Hills
4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Represa
3.3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Natoma Station
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
3.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Empire Ranch
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Related