Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally
Briggs Ranch Eviction Risk: Lower , Folsom
Tract 06067988300 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,478 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
The Briggs Ranch neighborhood of Folsom is where census tract 06067988300 sits, home to 4,478 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 4.5/10. That is riskier than about 24% of US census tracts.
0% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Renters make up 100% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 100%
Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units19
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate0.0%
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
7
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
3
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
3
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Folsom and the region
Centroid at 38.6945, -121.1538 · click any tract to drill in
Why Briggs Ranch scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Folsom
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
0.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Folsom
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Folsom
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Folsom
4.5
How Briggs Ranch compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 9%Socioeconomic
- 1%Household composition
- 86%Racial/ethnic minority
- 36%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Briggs Ranch. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.4%Housing insecurity
- 10.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 22.0%Food insecurity
- 17.9%SNAP enrollment
- 12.2%Transit barriers
- 17.0%No health insurance
- 18.6%Frequent mental distress
- 29.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Briggs Ranch
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Folsom, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 22.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 7th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067988300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067988300?
Census tract 06067988300 in the Briggs Ranch neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067988300?
0.0% of residents in tract 06067988300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,478.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067988300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 1th, minority 86th, housing 36th.
Q4
Is tract 06067988300 considered part of Briggs Ranch?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067988300 fall within Briggs Ranch (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067988300 struggle to pay rent?
About 22.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067988300 compare to Folsom overall?
Tract 06067988300 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Folsom at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Folsom; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Folsom
Top eight tracts in Folsom ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Lexington Hills
4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Represa
3.3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Old Town Folsom
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Natoma Station
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
3.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Prairie Oaks
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · CA
Briggs Ranch
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Related