Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally

Lifestyle Eviction Risk: Moderate , Fontana

Tract 06071002801 · San Bernardino, CA · pop 4,684 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 06071002801 runs through Lifestyle in Fontana. With 4,684 residents, it scores 6.2/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #15,818 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

39% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,713 monthly, set against $88,810 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 65% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 40% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,310
Renter share65.3%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate15.2%
Median income$88,810

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 13 tracts In Lifestyle
Moderate
Within parent city
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#13 of 44 tracts In Fontana
Elevated
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#294 of 466 tracts In San Bernardino
Low
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#5,204 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fontana and the region

Centroid at 34.1102, -117.4447 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lifestyle scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fontana
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.2% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,713 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fontana
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fontana
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fontana
6.1

How Lifestyle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lifestyle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 002801Fontana: 7.87.8Fontanaparent cityCounty: 5.65.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lifestyle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lifestyle

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fontana eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the San Bernardino County average of 6.5 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 21.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 80th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06071002801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06071002801?

Census tract 06071002801 in the Lifestyle neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06071002801?

Median gross rent is $1,713/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06071002801?

15.2% of residents in tract 06071002801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,684.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06071002801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 66th, minority 94th, housing 55th.
Q5

Is tract 06071002801 considered part of Lifestyle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06071002801 fall within Lifestyle (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06071002801 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06071002801 compare to Fontana overall?

Tract 06071002801 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Fontana at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fontana eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fontana

Top eight tracts in Fontana ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related