Forest Knolls Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075030102 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,726 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 06075030102 covers part of the Forest Knolls area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,726 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7586, -122.4578 · click any tract to drill in
Why Forest Knolls scores 9.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Forest Knolls compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 25
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 83%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 16%Grade B
- 12%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.4%Housing insecurity
- 4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.8%Food insecurity
- 6.4%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 4.0%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 20.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Forest Knolls
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. Average gross rent is $3,291, 33% above the San Francisco average.
18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. SNAP participation runs 6.4% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.0% against 11.3% nationally.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 97th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.3/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. around a third of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.
Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $206,515.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06075030102
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075030102?
What is the average rent in tract 06075030102?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075030102?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075030102?
Is tract 06075030102 considered part of Forest Knolls?
What share of households in tract 06075030102 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075030102 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075030102 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.