Seacliff Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075047904 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,145 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
06075047904 is a census tract in the Seacliff area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7825, -122.5099 · click any tract to drill in
Why Seacliff scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Seacliff compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 71
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 37%Socioeconomic
- 93%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 81%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 26%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Seacliff. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.8%Housing insecurity
- 5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.4%Food insecurity
- 11.6%SNAP enrollment
- 7.2%Transit barriers
- 5.7%No health insurance
- 14.8%Frequent mental distress
- 27.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Seacliff
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.
Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Set annual rent against average income of $87,494 and the ratio lands at 41%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Cost burden runs 48% here against 37.3% across San Francisco County. Average gross rent is $2,970, 20% above the San Francisco average. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06075047904
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075047904?
What is the average rent in tract 06075047904?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075047904?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075047904?
Is tract 06075047904 considered part of Seacliff?
What share of households in tract 06075047904 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075047904 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075047904 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.