Country Club Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06077001102 · San Joaquin, CA · pop 5,356 · 82% of tract blocks fall in Country Club
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06077001102 (Country Club in San Joaquin County, California) comes in at 6.3/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 83% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 68% of renter households, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,240 a month while the average household earns $57,083 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. Renters make up 44% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Country Club and the region
Centroid at 37.9676, -121.3254 · click any tract to drill in
Why Country Club scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Country Club compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 74
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 74%Socioeconomic
- 73%Household composition
- 76%Racial/ethnic minority
- 55%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 76%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 19.9%Housing insecurity
- 10.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.8%Food insecurity
- 21.4%SNAP enrollment
- 12.2%Transit barriers
- 14.7%No health insurance
- 18.8%Frequent mental distress
- 36.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Country Club
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Country Club, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the San Joaquin County average of 6.2 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 74th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 06077001102
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06077001102?
What is the average rent in tract 06077001102?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06077001102?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06077001102?
What share of households in tract 06077001102 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06077001102 compare to Country Club overall?
Was tract 06077001102 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Country Club
Top eight tracts in Country Club ranked by composite eviction-risk score.