Census Tract · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally

Country Club Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06077001102 · San Joaquin, CA · pop 5,356 · 82% of tract blocks fall in Country Club

With a score of 7.6/10, tract 06077001102 in Country Club, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,356 residents. The severe-burden share is 42%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score

7.6

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 14% Owners 56%

Tract context

Occupied units1,969

Renter share44.3%

SVI overall0.74

Poverty rate13.5%

Median income$57,083

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Country Club and the region

Centroid at 37.9676, -121.3254 · click any tract to drill in

Why Country Club scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Country Club

6.1

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

5.7

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

13.5% poverty · this tract

3.4

Supply constraint

$1,240 rent vs county FMR

2.1

Rent control risk

Inherited from Country Club

8.2

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.8

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Country Club

6.3

Housing court bias

Inherited from Country Club

7.4

How Country Club compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

74%Socioeconomic
73%Household composition
76%Racial/ethnic minority
55%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
76%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

19.9%Housing insecurity
10.3%Utility-shutoff threat
23.8%Food insecurity
21.4%SNAP enrollment
12.2%Transit barriers
14.7%No health insurance
18.8%Frequent mental distress
36.0%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Country Club

Cost burden runs 68% here against 47.9% across San Joaquin County. Average gross rent is $1,240, 33% below the Country Club average.

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.2/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.1/10. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 7.4/10.

It sits 0.8 points above the San Joaquin County average of 6.8. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Stockton. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 88th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 7.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $57,083.

44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06077001102

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06077001102?

Census tract 06077001102 in Country Club scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06077001102?

Median gross rent is $1,240/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06077001102?

13.5% of residents in tract 06077001102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,356.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06077001102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 73th, minority 76th, housing 55th.

What share of households in tract 06077001102 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06077001102 compare to Country Club overall?

Tract 06077001102 scores 7.6/10, higher than the parent city of Country Club at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Country Club; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06077001102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Country Club

Top eight tracts in Country Club ranked by composite eviction-risk score.