Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Washington Eviction Risk: Moderate , San Jose

Tract 06085501800 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 4,622 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

The Elevated-tier score of $1/10 for census tract 06085501800 reflects conditions in the Washington area of San Jose, California. That is riskier than about 76% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,316 monthly, set against $138,750 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 50% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 21% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,724
Renter share49.7%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$138,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Washington
Low
Within parent city
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#111 of 216 tracts In San Jose
Moderate
Within county
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#136 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Elevated
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#6,888 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3164, -121.8966 · click any tract to drill in

Why Washington scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$2,316 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How Washington compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Washington risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 501800San Jose: 9.29.2San Joseparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Washington. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Washington

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Jose eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 52nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085501800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085501800?

Census tract 06085501800 in the Washington neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085501800?

Median gross rent is $2,316/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085501800?

7.1% of residents in tract 06085501800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,622.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085501800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 37th, minority 74th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 06085501800 considered part of Washington?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085501800 fall within Washington (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085501800 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085501800 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085501800 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of San Jose at 9.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06085501800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 41% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related