Washington Eviction Risk: High , San Jose
Tract 06085502400 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 6,909 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
With a score of 8.6/10, tract 06085502400 in the Washington area of San Jose, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,909 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Jose and the region
Centroid at 37.3047, -121.8926 · click any tract to drill in
Why Washington scores 8.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Washington compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 11%Socioeconomic
- 25%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 59%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 34%Grade B
- 36%Grade C
- 20%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Washington. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.9%Food insecurity
- 6.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.1%Transit barriers
- 4.9%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 23.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Washington
26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10. On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.3/10.
SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.4/10. Against average income of $222,988, annual rent is just 14%.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06085502400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085502400?
What is the average rent in tract 06085502400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06085502400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06085502400?
Is tract 06085502400 considered part of Washington?
What share of households in tract 06085502400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06085502400 compare to San Jose overall?
Was tract 06085502400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Jose
Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.