Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally

Mary Lake Eviction Risk: Moderate , Keswick

Tract 06089010603 · Shasta, CA · pop 1,252 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 06089010603, home to 1,252 residents in Mary Lake in Keswick, scores 4.2/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 16% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

15% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,456 a month against an average household income of $108,214 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 9% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units360
Renter share10.8%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate14.7%
Median income$108,214

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Mary Lake
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Keswick
Moderate
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 50 tracts In Shasta
Low
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#3,936 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Keswick and the region

Centroid at 40.5814, -122.4542 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mary Lake scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Keswick
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.7% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,456 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Keswick
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Keswick
1.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Keswick
3.8

How Mary Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mary Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.95.9This tracttract 010603Keswick: 7.77.7Keswickparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mary Lake. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mary Lake

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Keswick, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Shasta County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089010603

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089010603?

Census tract 06089010603 in the Mary Lake neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06089010603?

Median gross rent is $1,456/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089010603?

14.7% of residents in tract 06089010603 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,252.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089010603?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 41th, minority 42th, housing 15th.
Q5

Is tract 06089010603 considered part of Mary Lake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089010603 fall within Mary Lake (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06089010603 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06089010603 compare to Keswick overall?

Tract 06089010603 scores 5.9/10, lower than the parent city of Keswick at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Keswick; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related