Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
Hickman Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06099002901 · Stanislaus, CA · pop 5,103 · 4% of tract blocks fall in Hickman
06099002901 is a census tract in Hickman, CA. It scores 4.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 5,103. Cost burden runs 17% here against 47.5% across Stanislaus County.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,614
Renter share34.3%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate6.0%
Median income$95,119
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
8
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
4
th percentile
Very Low
National
59
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hickman and the region
Centroid at 37.6014, -120.6513 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hickman scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hickman
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.0% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,537 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hickman
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hickman
4.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hickman
3.1
How Hickman compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 69
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 65%Socioeconomic
- 78%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 58%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.7%Housing insecurity
- 6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.8%Food insecurity
- 12.6%SNAP enrollment
- 8.2%Transit barriers
- 9.6%No health insurance
- 17.9%Frequent mental distress
- 33.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hickman
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.5/10. Against the Stanislaus County average of 6.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.2/10.
Average gross rent is $1,537, 17% above the Hickman average. On the softer side, housing-court posture reads 3.1/10.
On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 7.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.6 points cooler.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $95,119. 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06099002901
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06099002901?
Census tract 06099002901 in Hickman scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06099002901?
Median gross rent is $1,537/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06099002901?
6.0% of residents in tract 06099002901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,103.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06099002901?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 78th, minority 51th, housing 58th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06099002901 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06099002901 compare to Hickman overall?
Tract 06099002901 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Hickman at 6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hickman; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related