Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally
Traver Eviction Risk: High
Tract 06107000302 · Tulare, CA · pop 2,839 · 29% of tract blocks fall in Traver
06107000302 is a census tract in Traver, CA. It scores 8/10 for landlords. SNAP participation runs 46.2% against 15.2% nationally.
Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units724
Renter share50.1%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate36.5%
Median income$54,737
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
74
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
61
th percentile
Elevated
National
91
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Traver and the region
Centroid at 36.4516, -119.4468 · click any tract to drill in
Why Traver scores 8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Traver
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
36.5% poverty · this tract
9.1
Supply constraint
$950 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Traver
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Traver
7.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Traver
7.6
How Traver compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 92
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 90%Household composition
- 86%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 33.8%Housing insecurity
- 19.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 45.3%Food insecurity
- 46.2%SNAP enrollment
- 22.5%Transit barriers
- 28.0%No health insurance
- 21.5%Frequent mental distress
- 46.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Traver
The dominant input is economic stress at 9.1/10. Housing insecurity runs 33.8% against 14.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 36%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.6/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.6/10.
It sits 1.1 points above the Tulare County average of 6.9. That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.2/10.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 42% of renters.
Average gross rent is $950, close to the Traver average. Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $54,737.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06107000302
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06107000302?
Census tract 06107000302 in Traver scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06107000302?
Median gross rent is $950/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06107000302?
36.5% of residents in tract 06107000302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,839.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06107000302?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 90th, minority 86th, housing 61th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06107000302 struggle to pay rent?
About 33.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06107000302 compare to Traver overall?
Tract 06107000302 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Traver at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Traver; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related