Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #1,816 of 84,120 nationally
Richgrove Eviction Risk: High
Tract 06107004301 · Tulare, CA · pop 2,695 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Richgrove
With a score of 5.7/10, tract 06107004301 in Richgrove in Tulare County ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,695 residents. That is riskier than roughly 66% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 35% of renter households, a high level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $764 monthly, set against $44,872 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 63% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%
Stable renters 41%
Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units754
Renter share63.4%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate27.4%
Median income$44,872
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
89
th percentile
High
Within state
91
th percentile
Very High
National
98
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Richgrove and the region
Centroid at 35.8413, -119.1520 · click any tract to drill in
Why Richgrove scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Richgrove
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
27.4% poverty · this tract
6.9
Supply constraint
$764 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richgrove
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richgrove
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richgrove
6.5
How Richgrove compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 79%Household composition
- 95%Racial/ethnic minority
- 64%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 35.1%Housing insecurity
- 19.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 47.7%Food insecurity
- 46.6%SNAP enrollment
- 22.8%Transit barriers
- 31.3%No health insurance
- 21.0%Frequent mental distress
- 46.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Richgrove
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richgrove, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Tulare County average of 6.0 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 35.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 19.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06107004301
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06107004301?
Census tract 06107004301 in Richgrove scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06107004301?
Median gross rent is $764/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06107004301?
27.4% of residents in tract 06107004301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,695.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06107004301?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 79th, minority 95th, housing 64th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06107004301 struggle to pay rent?
About 35.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06107004301 compare to Richgrove overall?
Tract 06107004301 scores 8.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Richgrove at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richgrove; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related