Tract 06107004301 ·
Tulare, CA · pop 2,695 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Richgrove
Tract 06107004301 sits in Richgrove, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.1/10. Population here is 2,695. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%Stable renters 41%Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units754
Renter share63.4%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate27.4%
Median income$44,872
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Richgrove
Moderate
Within county
78th percentile
#23 of 103 tracts In Tulare
High
Within state
62th percentile
#3,423 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
91th percentile
#7,382 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Richgrove and the region
Centroid at 35.8413, -119.1520 · click any tract to drill in
Why Richgrove scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richgrove
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
27.4% poverty · this tract
6.9
Supply constraint
$764 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richgrove
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richgrove
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richgrove
6.5
How Richgrove compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
35.1%Housing insecurity
19.2%Utility-shutoff threat
47.7%Food insecurity
46.6%SNAP enrollment
22.8%Transit barriers
31.3%No health insurance
21.0%Frequent mental distress
46.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Richgrove
Adults with no health insurance runs 31.3% against 11.3% nationally. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. roughly one in three of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Tulare County average of 45.5%.
The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Disability prevalence runs 46.7% against 31.5% nationally.
The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Average gross rent is $764, 20% below the Richgrove average.
It sits 1.2 points above the Tulare County average of 6.9. On the high side, economic stress reads 6.9/10.
That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $44,872.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06107004301
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06107004301?
Census tract 06107004301 in Richgrove scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06107004301?
Median gross rent is $764/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06107004301?
27.4% of residents in tract 06107004301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,695.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06107004301?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 79th, minority 95th, housing 64th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06107004301 struggle to pay rent?
About 35.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06107004301 compare to Richgrove overall?
Tract 06107004301 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Richgrove at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richgrove; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.