Census Tract · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally
Eaton Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 08123001500 ·
Weld County, CO · pop 7,595 · 41% of tract blocks fall in Eaton
Tract 08123001500, home to 7,595 residents in Eaton, scores 5.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 66th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,770 monthly, set against $106,813 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 3%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units2,878
Renter share6.4%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$106,813
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Eaton
Moderate
Within county
31th percentile
#58 of 83 tracts In Weld County
Low
Within state
23th percentile
#1,113 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Low
National
9th percentile
#76,223 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Eaton and the region
Centroid at 40.5003, -104.6926 · click any tract to drill in
Why Eaton scores 1.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Eaton
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,770 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Eaton
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Eaton
2.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Eaton
6.0
How Eaton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 36
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Eaton, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Weld County average of 5.4 and in line with the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 36th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 08123001500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08123001500?
Census tract 08123001500 in Eaton scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 08123001500?
Median gross rent is $1,770/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 08123001500?
5.6% of residents in tract 08123001500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,595.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 08123001500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 45th, minority 47th, housing 34th.
Q5
How does tract 08123001500 compare to Eaton overall?
Tract 08123001500 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Eaton at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Eaton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.