Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally

Radnor Green Eviction Risk: Moderate , Claymont

Tract 10003010104 · New Castle County, DE · pop 3,928 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Tract 10003010104 covers the Radnor Green area of Claymont in Delaware. Home to 3,928 residents, it scores 6.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 83rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

52% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,210 monthly, set against $58,565 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 71% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 34% Owners 30%
Tract context
Occupied units1,759
Renter share70.6%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate12.4%
Median income$58,565

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Radnor Green
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Claymont
Very High
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#44 of 144 tracts In New Castle County
Elevated
Within state
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#72 of 259 tracts In Delaware
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Claymont and the region

Centroid at 39.7961, -75.4535 · click any tract to drill in

Why Radnor Green scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claymont
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Delaware legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
12.4% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,210 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claymont
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claymont
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claymont
5.1

How Radnor Green compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Radnor Green risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 010104Claymont: 4.14.1Claymontparent cityCounty: 3.43.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.43.4Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 58

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3,101Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 32.40%Avg annual filing rate
  • 38.2%Peak (2018)
  • 418Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 100030101042010: 328 filings (32.93/100 renter HHs)2011: 335 filings (31.66/100 renter HHs)2012: 381 filings (36.01/100 renter HHs)2013: 288 filings (27.22/100 renter HHs)2014: 304 filings (28.73/100 renter HHs)2015: 352 filings (33.27/100 renter HHs)2016: 327 filings (29.89/100 renter HHs)2017: 368 filings (33.64/100 renter HHs)2018: 418 filings (38.21/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 27% over the past 9 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,524Total filings 2020-21
  • 19.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 32.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.61×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 36 filings (1.20× baseline)2020-02-01: 37 filings (1.05× baseline)2020-03-01: 33 filings (1.27× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 47 filings (1.59× baseline)2020-08-01: 15 filings (0.41× baseline)2020-09-01: 26 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-10-01: 26 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-11-01: 23 filings (0.55× baseline)2020-12-01: 12 filings (0.34× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.10× baseline)2021-02-01: 26 filings (0.74× baseline)2021-03-01: 15 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-04-01: 10 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-06-01: 19 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-07-01: 51 filings (1.73× baseline)2021-08-01: 21 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-09-01: 28 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-10-01: 20 filings (0.51× baseline)2021-11-01: 23 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-12-01: 29 filings (0.81× baseline)2022-01-01: 16 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-02-01: 18 filings (0.51× baseline)2022-03-01: 12 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-04-01: 8 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-05-01: 15 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 11 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-07-01: 19 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-08-01: 18 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 22 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-10-01: 21 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-11-01: 17 filings (0.41× baseline)2022-12-01: 18 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 17 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-02-01: 24 filings (0.68× baseline)2023-03-01: 22 filings (0.85× baseline)2023-04-01: 16 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-05-01: 24 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 25 filings (0.72× baseline)2023-07-01: 17 filings (0.58× baseline)2023-08-01: 22 filings (0.61× baseline)2023-09-01: 24 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-10-01: 21 filings (0.54× baseline)2023-11-01: 18 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-12-01: 53 filings (1.48× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (0.30× baseline)2024-02-01: 21 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (0.38× baseline)2024-04-01: 35 filings (0.93× baseline)2024-05-01: 22 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-06-01: 27 filings (0.78× baseline)2024-07-01: 17 filings (0.58× baseline)2024-08-01: 29 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-09-01: 31 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-10-01: 12 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-11-01: 13 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-12-01: 23 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-02-01: 20 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-04-01: 60 filings (1.59× baseline)2025-05-01: 14 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-06-01: 21 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-07-01: 14 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.03× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.02× baseline)2025-10-01: 37 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-11-01: 29 filings (0.70× baseline)2025-12-01: 25 filings (0.70× baseline)2026-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tampa, FL as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Radnor Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Radnor Green

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Claymont eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the New Castle County average of 5.7 and above the Delaware statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.61x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 3,101 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 32.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 38.2% of renter households in 2018.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 10003010104

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 10003010104?

Census tract 10003010104 in the Radnor Green neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 10003010104?

Median gross rent is $1,210/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 10003010104?

12.4% of residents in tract 10003010104 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,928.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 10003010104?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 23th, minority 62th, housing 70th.
Q5

Is tract 10003010104 considered part of Radnor Green?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 10003010104 fall within Radnor Green (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 10003010104?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,101 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 10003010104 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 32.40% of renter households, peaking at 38.2% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 10003010104 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.61× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tampa, FL), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 10003010104 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 10003010104 compare to Claymont overall?

Tract 10003010104 scores 4.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Claymont at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claymont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claymont

Top eight tracts in Claymont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related