Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally
Radnor Green Eviction Risk: Moderate , Claymont
Tract 10003010104 · New Castle County, DE · pop 3,928 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 10003010104 covers part of the Radnor Green area of Claymont, DE, and scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,928 residents. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36%
Stable renters 34%
Owners 30%
Tract context
Occupied units1,759
Renter share70.6%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate12.4%
Median income$58,565
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
72
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
77
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Claymont and the region
Centroid at 39.7961, -75.4535 · click any tract to drill in
Why Radnor Green scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Claymont
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Delaware legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
12.4% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,210 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claymont
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claymont
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claymont
5.1
How Radnor Green compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 58%Socioeconomic
- 23%Household composition
- 62%Racial/ethnic minority
- 70%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 3,101Total filings over 9 yrs
- 32.40%Avg annual filing rate
- 38.2%Peak (2018)
- 418Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 27% over the past 9 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 1,524Total filings 2020-21
- 19.8Avg monthly (observed)
- 32.6Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.61×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tampa, FL as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Radnor Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.2%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.4%Food insecurity
- 15.2%SNAP enrollment
- 9.6%Transit barriers
- 9.6%No health insurance
- 16.8%Frequent mental distress
- 29.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Radnor Green
24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.7/10.
This is renter territory: 71% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.7/10. Cost burden runs 52% here against 44.1% across New Castle County.
Court records carry 3,101 eviction filings across 9 observed years. Against the New Castle County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points.
The worst year on record was 2018, when 38.2% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 32.4% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the DE average is 4.1, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 10003010104
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 10003010104?
Census tract 10003010104 in the Radnor Green neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 10003010104?
Median gross rent is $1,210/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 10003010104?
12.4% of residents in tract 10003010104 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,928.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 10003010104?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 23th, minority 62th, housing 70th.
Q5
Is tract 10003010104 considered part of Radnor Green?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 10003010104 fall within Radnor Green (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 10003010104?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,101 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 10003010104 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 32.40% of renter households, peaking at 38.2% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 10003010104 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.61× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tampa, FL), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 10003010104 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 10003010104 compare to Claymont overall?
Tract 10003010104 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Claymont at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claymont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Claymont
Top eight tracts in Claymont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related