Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally
Radnor Green Eviction Risk: Lower , Claymont
Tract 10003010300 · New Castle County, DE · pop 4,155 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
With a score of 3.6/10, tract 10003010300 in the Radnor Green area of Claymont, DE reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,155. Cost burden runs 14% here against 44.1% across New Castle County.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,677
Renter share25.1%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$102,598
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
40
th percentile
Low
Within state
44
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Claymont and the region
Centroid at 39.8024, -75.4676 · click any tract to drill in
Why Radnor Green scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Claymont
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Delaware legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,736 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claymont
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claymont
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claymont
5.1
How Radnor Green compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 15%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 73%Racial/ethnic minority
- 20%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 289Total filings over 9 yrs
- 16.24%Avg annual filing rate
- 10.8%Peak (2018)
- 36Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 9 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 175Total filings 2020-21
- 2.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 4.9Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.46×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tampa, FL as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Radnor Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.3%Housing insecurity
- 7.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.6%Food insecurity
- 10.5%SNAP enrollment
- 7.7%Transit barriers
- 8.2%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 25.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Radnor Green
What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10. Average gross rent is $1,736, 33% above the Claymont average.
Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.7/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 2.2/10. The filing record is not thin: 289 evictions over 9 years of observation.
It sits 0.6 points below the New Castle County average of 4.2. The worst year on record was 2018, when 10.8% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 16.2% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #56,048 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.9/10.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $102,598. 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 10003010300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 10003010300?
Census tract 10003010300 in the Radnor Green neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 10003010300?
Median gross rent is $1,736/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 14% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 10003010300?
8.6% of residents in tract 10003010300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,155.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 10003010300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 82th, minority 73th, housing 20th.
Q5
Is tract 10003010300 considered part of Radnor Green?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 10003010300 fall within Radnor Green (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 10003010300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 289 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 10003010300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.24% of renter households, peaking at 10.8% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 10003010300 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.46× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tampa, FL), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 10003010300 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 10003010300 compare to Claymont overall?
Tract 10003010300 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Claymont at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claymont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Claymont
Top eight tracts in Claymont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related