Neighborhood · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally
Radnor Green Eviction Risk: Lower , Claymont
Tract 10003010300 ·
New Castle County, DE · pop 4,155 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Here is how census tract 10003010300, in Radnor Green in Claymont eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.3/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 4,155. That is riskier than roughly 51% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
14% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,736 a month while the average household earns $102,598 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 22%Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,677
Renter share25.1%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$102,598
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#3 of 3 tracts In Radnor Green
Very Low
Within parent city
0th percentile
#4 of 4 tracts In Claymont
Very Low
Within county
52th percentile
#70 of 144 tracts In New Castle County
Moderate
Within state
53th percentile
#123 of 259 tracts In Delaware
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Claymont and the region
Centroid at 39.8024, -75.4676 · click any tract to drill in
Why Radnor Green scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claymont
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Delaware legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,736 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claymont
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claymont
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claymont
5.1
How Radnor Green compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
15%Socioeconomic
82%Household composition
73%Racial/ethnic minority
20%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
289Total filings over 9 yrs
16.24%Avg annual filing rate
10.8%Peak (2018)
36Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2010 to 2018
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 9 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
175Total filings 2020-21
2.3Avg monthly (observed)
4.9Pre-pandemic baseline
0.46×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tampa, FL as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Radnor Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
12.3%Housing insecurity
7.6%Utility-shutoff threat
13.6%Food insecurity
10.5%SNAP enrollment
7.7%Transit barriers
8.2%No health insurance
16.1%Frequent mental distress
25.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Radnor Green
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Claymont eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the New Castle County average of 5.7 and in line with the Delaware statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 32nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 289 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 16.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.8% of renter households in 2018.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 10003010300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 10003010300?
Census tract 10003010300 in the Radnor Green neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 10003010300?
Median gross rent is $1,736/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 14% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 10003010300?
8.6% of residents in tract 10003010300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,155.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 10003010300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 82th, minority 73th, housing 20th.
Q5
Is tract 10003010300 considered part of Radnor Green?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 10003010300 fall within Radnor Green (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 10003010300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 289 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 10003010300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.24% of renter households, peaking at 10.8% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 10003010300 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.46× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tampa, FL), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 10003010300 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 10003010300 compare to Claymont overall?
Tract 10003010300 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Claymont at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claymont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Claymont
Top eight tracts in Claymont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.