Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Radnor Green Eviction Risk: Moderate , Claymont
Tract 10003010400 · New Castle County, DE · pop 4,843 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Tract 10003010400 sits in the Radnor Green area of Claymont eviction risk, DE, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.1/10. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units1,929
Renter share31.2%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate9.7%
Median income$85,391
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
55
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
61
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Claymont and the region
Centroid at 39.7932, -75.4802 · click any tract to drill in
Why Radnor Green scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Claymont
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Delaware legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
9.7% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,494 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claymont
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claymont
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claymont
5.1
How Radnor Green compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 24%Socioeconomic
- 51%Household composition
- 44%Racial/ethnic minority
- 16%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 908Total filings over 9 yrs
- 18.08%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.2%Peak (2012)
- 68Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 27% over the past 9 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 238Total filings 2020-21
- 3.1Avg monthly (observed)
- 2.1Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.51×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tampa, FL as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Radnor Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.4%Housing insecurity
- 6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.6%Food insecurity
- 8.4%SNAP enrollment
- 6.4%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 15.4%Frequent mental distress
- 27.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Radnor Green
Cost burden runs around a third here against 44.1% across New Castle County. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.7/10.
Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.4/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 908 filings here across 9 tracked years.
Average gross rent is $1,494, 14% above the Claymont average. Food insecurity runs 10.6% against 17.8% nationally. Filings peaked in 2012 at 23.2% of renter households.
In a typical year about 18.1% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. It tracks the New Castle County average of 4.2 closely.
Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $85,391.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 10003010400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 10003010400?
Census tract 10003010400 in the Radnor Green neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 10003010400?
Median gross rent is $1,494/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 10003010400?
9.7% of residents in tract 10003010400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,843.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 10003010400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 51th, minority 44th, housing 16th.
Q5
Is tract 10003010400 considered part of Radnor Green?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 10003010400 fall within Radnor Green (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 10003010400?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 908 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 10003010400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.08% of renter households, peaking at 23.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 10003010400 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.51× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tampa, FL), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 10003010400 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 10003010400 compare to Claymont overall?
Tract 10003010400 scores 4.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Claymont at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claymont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Claymont
Top eight tracts in Claymont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related