Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Woodfield Eviction Risk: Lower , June Park

Tract 12009065001 · Brevard, FL · pop 4,005 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 12009065001 in the Woodfield area of June Park, FL reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,005. Against Brevard County at 48.9%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 11% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,486
Renter share15.3%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$102,768

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Woodfield
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In June Park
Moderate
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#145 of 147 tracts In Brevard
Very Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#3,704 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across June Park and the region

Centroid at 28.0690, -80.6851 · click any tract to drill in

Why Woodfield scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from June Park
4.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,661 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from June Park
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from June Park
4.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from June Park
5.5

How Woodfield compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Woodfield risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 065001June Park: 3.53.5June Parkparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 54Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 4.35%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.5%Peak (2017)
  • 6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120090650012002: 4 filings (3.36/100 renter HHs)2003: 9 filings (7.56/100 renter HHs)2004: 5 filings (4.20/100 renter HHs)2011: 2 filings (2.70/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (1.35/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (6.76/100 renter HHs)2015: 5 filings (6.76/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (0.47/100 renter HHs)2017: 16 filings (7.51/100 renter HHs)2018: 6 filings (2.82/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Woodfield. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Woodfield

Severe burden reaches 31%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.5/10.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.5/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10. Against the Brevard County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points.

The filing record is not thin: 54 evictions over 10 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2017, when 7.5% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 4.3% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the FL average is 4.1, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 12009065001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12009065001?

Census tract 12009065001 in the Woodfield neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12009065001?

Median gross rent is $1,661/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12009065001?

6.2% of residents in tract 12009065001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,005.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12009065001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 29th, minority 51th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 12009065001 considered part of Woodfield?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12009065001 fall within Woodfield (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12009065001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 54 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 12009065001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.35% of renter households, peaking at 7.5% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 12009065001 compare to June Park overall?

Tract 12009065001 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of June Park at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from June Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related