Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally

Altos Verdes Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tampa

Tract 12057001001 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 3,834 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Here is how census tract 12057001001, in the Altos Verdes area of Tampa eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.1/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,834. That is riskier than roughly 43% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 67% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,133 a month while the average household earns $33,914 a year, roughly 40% of income at the averages. About 80% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 54% Stable renters 26% Owners 20%
Tract context
Occupied units1,301
Renter share79.9%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate25.8%
Median income$33,914

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Altos Verdes
Low
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#19 of 104 tracts In Tampa
High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#279 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tampa and the region

Centroid at 28.0178, -82.4275 · click any tract to drill in

Why Altos Verdes scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
25.8% poverty · this tract
6.5
Supply constraint
$1,133 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5

How Altos Verdes compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Altos Verdes risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 001001Tampa: 2.72.7Tampaparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 560Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 9.07%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.0%Peak (2015)
  • 105Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570010012000: 4 filings (2.04/100 renter HHs)2001: 2 filings (1.02/100 renter HHs)2002: 13 filings (6.64/100 renter HHs)2003: 10 filings (5.11/100 renter HHs)2004: 16 filings (8.18/100 renter HHs)2005: 23 filings (7.63/100 renter HHs)2009: 92 filings (30.51/100 renter HHs)2010: 97 filings (9.96/100 renter HHs)2011: 89 filings (8.95/100 renter HHs)2015: 109 filings (10.97/100 renter HHs)2016: 105 filings (8.74/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 2,525% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 440Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 7.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.80×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-12-01: 13 filings (1.37× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-02-01: 9 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-02-01: 6 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2022-05-01: 13 filings (1.53× baseline)2022-06-01: 9 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-07-01: 7 filings (1.04× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.16× baseline)2022-09-01: 11 filings (1.22× baseline)2022-10-01: 13 filings (2.26× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (0.97× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2023-08-01: 14 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (2.29× baseline)2023-12-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-02-01: 16 filings (2.13× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (1.65× baseline)2024-06-01: 8 filings (0.97× baseline)2024-07-01: 16 filings (2.37× baseline)2024-08-01: 14 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-10-01: 8 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-11-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-12-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (0.88× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (0.59× baseline)2025-06-01: 15 filings (1.82× baseline)2025-07-01: 13 filings (1.93× baseline)2025-08-01: 23 filings (1.88× baseline)2025-09-01: 24 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 9 filings (1.57× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Altos Verdes. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Altos Verdes

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 6.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 560 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 9.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.0% of renter households in 2015.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.80x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057001001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057001001?

Census tract 12057001001 in the Altos Verdes neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057001001?

Median gross rent is $1,133/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057001001?

25.8% of residents in tract 12057001001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,834.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057001001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 98th, minority 93th, housing 85th.
Q5

Is tract 12057001001 considered part of Altos Verdes?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057001001 fall within Altos Verdes (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057001001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 560 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057001001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.07% of renter households, peaking at 11.0% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057001001 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.80× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057001001 compare to Tampa overall?

Tract 12057001001 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Tampa at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 12057001001 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tampa

Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related