Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally

Macfarlane Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tampa

Tract 12057002702 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 2,772 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

12057002702 is a census tract in the Macfarlane Park area of Tampa, FL. It scores 4.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,772. Against Hillsborough County at 51.5%, 30% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 19% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units1,179
Renter share27.2%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate13.5%
Median income$62,474

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Macfarlane Park
Very High
Within parent city
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 104 tracts In Tampa
Moderate
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#142 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Elevated
Within state
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#1,664 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tampa and the region

Centroid at 27.9693, -82.4900 · click any tract to drill in

Why Macfarlane Park scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
13.5% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,241 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5

How Macfarlane Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Macfarlane Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.5This tracttract 0027024.0Tampaparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 40Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.62×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Macfarlane Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Macfarlane Park

Severe burden reaches 30%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1.3/10.

Adults with no health insurance runs 27.9% against 11.3% nationally. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,241, 27% below the Tampa average.

On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #41,206 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Hillsborough County average of 4.2 closely.

Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $62,474.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057002702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057002702?

Census tract 12057002702 in the Macfarlane Park neighborhood scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057002702?

Median gross rent is $1,241/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057002702?

13.5% of residents in tract 12057002702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,772.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057002702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 95th, minority 84th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 12057002702 considered part of Macfarlane Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057002702 fall within Macfarlane Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12057002702 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.62× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12057002702 compare to Tampa overall?

Tract 12057002702 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Tampa at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 12057002702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 97% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tampa

Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related