Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood Eviction Risk: Lower , Tampa

Tract 12057005401 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 5,449 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 12057005401 runs through Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood in Tampa. With 5,449 residents, it scores 4.5/10 for landlords. It lands near the 24th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,592 a month while the average household earns $126,071 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 42% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 20% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units2,368
Renter share42.0%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$126,071

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood
Very Low
Within parent city
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#97 of 104 tracts In Tampa
Very Low
Within county
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#273 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very Low
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#4,242 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tampa and the region

Centroid at 27.9216, -82.4559 · click any tract to drill in

Why Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,592 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5

How Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 005401Tampa: 2.72.7Tampaparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 27

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 132Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 1.26%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.0%Peak (2001)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570054012000: 15 filings (1.59/100 renter HHs)2001: 19 filings (2.01/100 renter HHs)2002: 9 filings (0.95/100 renter HHs)2003: 9 filings (0.95/100 renter HHs)2004: 12 filings (1.27/100 renter HHs)2005: 12 filings (1.36/100 renter HHs)2009: 15 filings (1.70/100 renter HHs)2010: 14 filings (1.41/100 renter HHs)2011: 17 filings (1.61/100 renter HHs)2015: 8 filings (0.76/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (0.22/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 87% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 63Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.35×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (12.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (8.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (16.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (12.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (8.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 27th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.35x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057005401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057005401?

Census tract 12057005401 in the Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057005401?

Median gross rent is $1,592/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057005401?

3.1% of residents in tract 12057005401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,449.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057005401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 47th, minority 28th, housing 30th.
Q5

Is tract 12057005401 considered part of Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057005401 fall within Historic Hyde Park North Neighborhood (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057005401?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 132 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057005401 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.26% of renter households, peaking at 2.0% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057005401 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.35× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057005401 compare to Tampa overall?

Tract 12057005401 scores 2.2/10, lower than the parent city of Tampa at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 12057005401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 3% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tampa

Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related