Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Rattlesnake Eviction Risk: Lower , Tampa
Tract 12057007102 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 4,114 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 12057007102 in the Rattlesnake area of Tampa, FL reads lower for landlord eviction risk. 80% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39%
Stable renters 41%
Owners 20%
Tract context
Occupied units2,544
Renter share80.0%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$100,147
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
16
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
11
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
28
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tampa and the region
Centroid at 27.8895, -82.5302 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rattlesnake scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,197 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5
How Rattlesnake compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 53%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 354Total filings over 11 yrs
- 10.41%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.0%Peak (2002)
- 34Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 146Total filings 2020-21
- 2.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 1.5Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.30×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rattlesnake. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rattlesnake
Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. Average gross rent is $2,197, 29% above the Tampa average.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.6/10. Disability prevalence runs 19.2% against 31.5% nationally. Against the Hillsborough County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points.
The severe-burden share is 11%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The filing record is not thin: 354 evictions over 11 years of observation.
The worst year on record was 2002, when 23.0% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Tampa. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 10.4% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.2/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 12057007102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057007102?
Census tract 12057007102 in the Rattlesnake neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12057007102?
Median gross rent is $2,197/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057007102?
6.5% of residents in tract 12057007102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,114.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057007102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 14th, minority 53th, housing 48th.
Q5
Is tract 12057007102 considered part of Rattlesnake?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057007102 fall within Rattlesnake (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057007102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 354 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057007102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.41% of renter households, peaking at 23.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12057007102 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.30× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12057007102 compare to Tampa overall?
Tract 12057007102 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Tampa at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 12057007102 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Tampa
Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · FL
Altamira Heights
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Riverside
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Almima
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
The Oaks
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Vedado
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Altos Verdes
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Capitano
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · FL
Altos Verdes
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related