Neighborhood · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally
Copeland Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , Citrus Park
Tract 12057011410 ·
Hillsborough, FL · pop 6,570 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 12057011410 runs through Copeland Creek in Citrus Park. With 6,570 residents, it scores 5.4/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #38,542 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 61% of renter households, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,148 monthly, set against $109,323 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 20% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%Stable renters 8%Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units2,571
Renter share19.8%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate6.1%
Median income$109,323
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Copeland Creek
Moderate
Within parent city
0th percentile
#5 of 5 tracts In Citrus Park
Very Low
Within county
14th percentile
#287 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very Low
Within state
15th percentile
#4,368 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Citrus Park and the region
Centroid at 28.0965, -82.5626 · click any tract to drill in
Why Copeland Creek scores 2.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Citrus Park
4.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.1% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$2,148 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Citrus Park
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Citrus Park
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Citrus Park
6.7
How Copeland Creek compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
21%Socioeconomic
56%Household composition
60%Racial/ethnic minority
15%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
110Total filings over 11 yrs
6.23%Avg annual filing rate
11.1%Peak (2015)
16Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2016
Filings climbed 129% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
95Total filings 2020-21
1.3Avg monthly (observed)
1.2Pre-pandemic baseline
1.06×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Copeland Creek
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Citrus Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.06x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 110 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 6.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.1% of renter households in 2015.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12057011410
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057011410?
Census tract 12057011410 in the Copeland Creek neighborhood scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12057011410?
Median gross rent is $2,148/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057011410?
6.1% of residents in tract 12057011410 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,570.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057011410?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 56th, minority 60th, housing 15th.
Q5
Is tract 12057011410 considered part of Copeland Creek?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057011410 fall within Copeland Creek (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057011410?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 110 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057011410 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.23% of renter households, peaking at 11.1% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12057011410 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.06× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12057011410 compare to Citrus Park overall?
Tract 12057011410 scores 2.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Citrus Park at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Citrus Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Citrus Park
Top eight tracts in Citrus Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.