Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,926 of 84,120 nationally
Chinese Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Coral Gables
Tract 12086007200 · Miami-Dade, FL · pop 2,612 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
In the Chinese Village area of Coral Gables, census tract 12086007200 scores 5.2/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 47% of US census tracts.
About 60% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,354 a month against an average household income of $60,461 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 78% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46%
Stable renters 31%
Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units1,151
Renter share77.6%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate20.0%
Median income$60,461
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
77
th percentile
High
Within state
87
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Coral Gables and the region
Centroid at 25.7268, -80.2536 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chinese Village scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Coral Gables
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
20.0% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$1,354 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Coral Gables
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Coral Gables
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Coral Gables
5.0
How Chinese Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 92%Racial/ethnic minority
- 56%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 14%Grade C
- 78%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 204Total filings over 2 yrs
- 14.69%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.6%Peak (2015)
- 88Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 165Total filings 2020-21
- 2.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 3.3Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.68×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Miami as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Chinese Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Chinese Village
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Coral Gables, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Miami-Dade County average of 5.3 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 78% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12086007200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12086007200?
Census tract 12086007200 in the Chinese Village neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12086007200?
Median gross rent is $1,354/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12086007200?
20.0% of residents in tract 12086007200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,612.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12086007200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 38th, minority 92th, housing 56th.
Q5
Is tract 12086007200 considered part of Chinese Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12086007200 fall within Chinese Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12086007200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 204 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 12086007200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.69% of renter households, peaking at 17.6% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12086007200 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.68× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Miami eviction risk), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12086007200 compare to Coral Gables overall?
Tract 12086007200 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Coral Gables at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Coral Gables; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 12086007200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 78% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Coral Gables
Top eight tracts in Coral Gables ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · FL
Little Havana
6.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Little Haiti
6.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Little Haiti
6.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Wynwood
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Little Havana
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Little Haiti
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Downtown Miami
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · FL
Little Havana
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Related