Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Chinese Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Coral Gables

Tract 12086007401 · Miami-Dade, FL · pop 1,334 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 12086007401 covers part of the Chinese Village area of Coral Gables, FL, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 32% here against 57.9% across Miami-Dade County.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 7% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units548
Renter share10.2%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate1.2%
Median income$239,853

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Chinese Village
Very Low
Within parent city
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#9 of 18 tracts In Coral Gables
Moderate
Within county
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#680 of 706 tracts In Miami-Dade
Very Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#3,704 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Coral Gables and the region

Centroid at 25.7185, -80.2647 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chinese Village scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Coral Gables
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
1.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Coral Gables
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Coral Gables
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Coral Gables
5.8

How Chinese Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chinese Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0074014.3Coral Gablesparent city4.6Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 3Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.50×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Miami as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chinese Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chinese Village

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. At $3,501 a month, rents run 48% over what the rest of Coral Gables commands.

The voucher gap is 50.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10.

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.3/10. Against the Miami-Dade County average of 4.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points.

Disability prevalence runs 18.4% against 31.5% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Miami. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Only 10% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $239,853, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Statewide the FL average is 4.1, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 12086007401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12086007401?

Census tract 12086007401 in the Chinese Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12086007401?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12086007401?

1.2% of residents in tract 12086007401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,334.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12086007401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 42th, minority 74th, housing 8th.
Q5

Is tract 12086007401 considered part of Chinese Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12086007401 fall within Chinese Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12086007401 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.50× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Miami eviction risk), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12086007401 compare to Coral Gables overall?

Tract 12086007401 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Coral Gables at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Coral Gables; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 12086007401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Coral Gables

Top eight tracts in Coral Gables ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related