Neighborhood · Ranked #78,212 of 84,120 nationally
Lake Mango Shores Eviction Risk: Lower , Palm Springs
Tract 12099004300 ·
Palm Beach, FL · pop 6,189 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
The Moderate-tier score of 4.3/10 for census tract 12099004300 reflects conditions in Lake Mango Shores in Palm Springs, Florida. On the national scale it ranks #68,511 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 64% of renter households, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,186 monthly, set against $112,733 in average yearly household income, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%Stable renters 5%Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units2,134
Renter share15.0%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$112,733
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#5 of 5 tracts In Lake Mango Shores
Very Low
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Palm Springs
Moderate
Within county
14th percentile
#322 of 372 tracts In Palm Beach
Very Low
Within state
6th percentile
#4,816 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Palm Springs and the region
Centroid at 26.6474, -80.0781 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lake Mango Shores scores 1.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Palm Springs
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,186 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palm Springs
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palm Springs
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palm Springs
2.3
How Lake Mango Shores compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 47
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
47%Socioeconomic
54%Household composition
60%Racial/ethnic minority
36%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
269Total filings over 11 yrs
6.92%Avg annual filing rate
10.1%Peak (2002)
17Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2015
Filings dropped 23% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
112Total filings 2020-21
1.5Avg monthly (observed)
1.3Pre-pandemic baseline
1.20×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Other Oregon Counties as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lake Mango Shores. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 2.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Palm Springs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Palm Beach County average of 5.0 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 269 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 6.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.1% of renter households in 2002.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.20x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12099004300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12099004300?
Census tract 12099004300 in the Lake Mango Shores neighborhood scores 1.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12099004300?
Median gross rent is $1,186/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12099004300?
3.6% of residents in tract 12099004300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,189.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12099004300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 47th, household 54th, minority 60th, housing 36th.
Q5
Is tract 12099004300 considered part of Lake Mango Shores?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12099004300 fall within Lake Mango Shores (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12099004300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 269 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12099004300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.92% of renter households, peaking at 10.1% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 12099004300 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.20× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Other Oregon eviction laws Counties), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 12099004300 compare to Palm Springs overall?
Tract 12099004300 scores 1.6/10, lower than the parent city of Palm Springs at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palm Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.