Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Sherwood Forest Eviction Risk: Moderate , Morrow

Tract 13063040417 · Clayton County, GA · pop 6,710 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Eviction risk in Sherwood Forest in Morrow centers on tract 13063040417, which scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 6,710 residents. That is riskier than about 91% of US census tracts.

About 67% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,307 monthly, set against $44,567 in average yearly household income, roughly 35% of income at the averages. About 82% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 55% Stable renters 27% Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units2,192
Renter share82.3%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate16.7%
Median income$44,567

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sherwood Forest
Moderate
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Morrow
Low
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Elevated
Within state
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#821 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Morrow and the region

Centroid at 33.5614, -84.3537 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sherwood Forest scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Morrow
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
16.7% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$1,307 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Morrow
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Morrow
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Morrow
7.0

How Sherwood Forest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sherwood Forest risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 040417Morrow: 2.92.9Morrowparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 92

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 9,648Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 114.83%Avg annual filing rate
  • 252.4%Peak (2008)
  • 835Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630404172002: 816 filings (169.59/100 renter HHs)2005: 780 filings (190.77/100 renter HHs)2007: 831 filings (203.24/100 renter HHs)2008: 1,032 filings (252.40/100 renter HHs)2010: 817 filings (58.90/100 renter HHs)2011: 936 filings (69.59/100 renter HHs)2012: 825 filings (61.34/100 renter HHs)2013: 884 filings (65.72/100 renter HHs)2014: 879 filings (65.35/100 renter HHs)2015: 1,013 filings (75.32/100 renter HHs)2016: 835 filings (50.85/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 3,530Total filings 2020-21
  • 46.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 69 filings (690.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 51 filings (510.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 121 filings (1,210.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 84 filings (840.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 95 filings (950.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 65 filings (650.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 67 filings (670.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 72 filings (720.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 101 filings (1,010.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 57 filings (570.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 97 filings (970.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 76 filings (760.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 63 filings (630.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 79 filings (790.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 61 filings (610.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 51 filings (510.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 67 filings (670.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 80 filings (800.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 55 filings (550.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 63 filings (630.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 87 filings (870.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 59 filings (590.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 55 filings (550.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 63 filings (630.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sherwood Forest

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Morrow, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 92nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 9,648 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 114.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 252.4% of renter households in 2008.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040417

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040417?

Census tract 13063040417 in the Sherwood Forest neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040417?

Median gross rent is $1,307/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040417?

16.7% of residents in tract 13063040417 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,710.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040417?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 77th, minority 96th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040417 considered part of Sherwood Forest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040417 fall within Sherwood Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040417?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9,648 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040417 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 114.83% of renter households, peaking at 252.4% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040417 struggle to pay rent?

About 37.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 26.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040417 compare to Morrow overall?

Tract 13063040417 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Morrow at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Morrow; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Morrow

Top eight tracts in Morrow ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related