Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,554 of 84,120 nationally

Frog Hollow Eviction Risk: Moderate , Riverdale

Tract 13063040512 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,849 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 13063040512 runs through the Frog Hollow neighborhood of Riverdale. With 4,849 residents, it scores $1/10 for landlords. It lands near the 95th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

76% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 46% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,295 a month against an average household income of $42,656 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. Renters make up 45% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 11% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units1,973
Renter share44.9%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate21.7%
Median income$42,656

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Frog Hollow
Moderate
Within parent city
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 12 tracts In Riverdale
Elevated
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
High
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#567 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5744, -84.4333 · click any tract to drill in

Why Frog Hollow scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
21.7% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,295 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
6.8

How Frog Hollow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Frog Hollow risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 040512Riverdale: 2.62.6Riverdaleparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 6,535Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 66.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 92.1%Peak (2007)
  • 387Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630405122002: 450 filings (56.75/100 renter HHs)2005: 673 filings (81.67/100 renter HHs)2007: 759 filings (92.11/100 renter HHs)2008: 659 filings (79.98/100 renter HHs)2010: 724 filings (87.33/100 renter HHs)2011: 687 filings (70.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 647 filings (66.09/100 renter HHs)2013: 441 filings (45.05/100 renter HHs)2014: 682 filings (69.66/100 renter HHs)2015: 426 filings (43.51/100 renter HHs)2016: 387 filings (36.44/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,489Total filings 2020-21
  • 32.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 86 filings (860.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 61 filings (610.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 90 filings (900.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 68 filings (680.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 67 filings (670.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 57 filings (570.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 102 filings (1,020.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 67 filings (670.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 61 filings (610.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Frog Hollow

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Riverdale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 6,535 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 66.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 92.1% of renter households in 2007.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 70th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040512

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040512?

Census tract 13063040512 in the Frog Hollow neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040512?

Median gross rent is $1,295/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040512?

21.7% of residents in tract 13063040512 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,849.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040512?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 71th, minority 97th, housing 50th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040512 considered part of Frog Hollow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040512 fall within Frog Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040512?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 6,535 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040512 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 66.25% of renter households, peaking at 92.1% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040512 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040512 compare to Riverdale overall?

Tract 13063040512 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Riverdale at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverdale

Top eight tracts in Riverdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related