Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Frog Hollow Eviction Risk: Moderate , Riverdale

Tract 13063040512 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,849 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 13063040512 covers part of the Frog Hollow area of Riverdale, GA, and scores 5/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 46%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 11% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units1,973
Renter share44.9%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate21.7%
Median income$42,656

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Frog Hollow
Moderate
Within parent city
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 12 tracts In Riverdale
Elevated
Within county
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#28 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Elevated
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#681 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5744, -84.4333 · click any tract to drill in

Why Frog Hollow scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
21.7% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,295 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
6.8

How Frog Hollow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Frog Hollow risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.0This tracttract 0405124.0Riverdaleparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 6,535Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 66.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 92.1%Peak (2007)
  • 387Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13063040512
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,489Total filings 2020-21
  • 32.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Frog Hollow

Against Clayton County at 53.3%, 76% of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.9/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.

Set annual rent against average income of $42,656 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.7/10. The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Housing insecurity runs 25.0% against 14.2% nationally. SNAP participation runs 25.4% against 15.2% nationally.

The filing record is not thin: 6,535 evictions over 11 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2007 at 92.1% of renter households.

In a typical year about 66.3% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 61st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Social vulnerability reads 7.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040512

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040512?

Census tract 13063040512 in the Frog Hollow neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040512?

Median gross rent is $1,295/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040512?

21.7% of residents in tract 13063040512 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,849.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040512?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 71th, minority 97th, housing 50th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040512 considered part of Frog Hollow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040512 fall within Frog Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040512?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 6,535 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040512 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 66.25% of renter households, peaking at 92.1% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040512 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040512 compare to Riverdale overall?

Tract 13063040512 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Riverdale at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverdale

Top eight tracts in Riverdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related