Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Wynterhall Eviction Risk: Lower , Dunwoody

Tract 13089021213 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 3,593 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

In Wynterhall in Dunwoody, census tract 13089021213 scores 5.2/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 0% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $234,000 a year. About 1% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 1% Owners 99%
Tract context
Occupied units1,212
Renter share0.8%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate0.9%
Median income$234,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Wynterhall
Moderate
Within parent city
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 13 tracts In Dunwoody
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#199 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#2,718 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dunwoody and the region

Centroid at 33.9541, -84.3423 · click any tract to drill in

Why Wynterhall scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dunwoody
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
0.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dunwoody
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dunwoody
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dunwoody
5.9

How Wynterhall compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Wynterhall risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 021213Dunwoody: 2.32.3Dunwoodyparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 9Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 6.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.8%Peak (2016)
  • 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890212132004: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 2 filings (4.88/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (2.44/100 renter HHs)2013: 2 filings (4.88/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (2.44/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (15.79/100 renter HHs)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 15Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Wynterhall

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dunwoody eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and below the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 9 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 6.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.8% of renter households in 2016.

In CDC survey modeling, about 4.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021213

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021213?

Census tract 13089021213 in the Wynterhall neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021213?

0.9% of residents in tract 13089021213 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,593.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021213?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 0th, household 44th, minority 14th, housing 1th.
Q4

Is tract 13089021213 considered part of Wynterhall?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021213 fall within Wynterhall (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021213?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 13089021213 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.09% of renter households, peaking at 15.8% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089021213 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089021213 compare to Dunwoody overall?

Tract 13089021213 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Dunwoody at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dunwoody eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dunwoody

Top eight tracts in Dunwoody ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related