Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Ashford Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Brookhaven

Tract 13089021412 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 3,812 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

The Ashford Park neighborhood of Brookhaven is where census tract 13089021412 sits, home to 3,812 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 6.6/10. On the national scale it ranks #9,265 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 51% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,593 a month while the average household earns $220,694 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 7% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,461
Renter share13.1%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate1.4%
Median income$220,694

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Ashford Park
Very Low
Within parent city
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 17 tracts In Brookhaven
Very Low
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#187 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#2,523 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brookhaven and the region

Centroid at 33.8718, -84.3152 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ashford Park scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brookhaven
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
1.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,593 rent vs county FMR
9.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brookhaven
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brookhaven
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brookhaven
5.6

How Ashford Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ashford Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.71.7This tracttract 021412Brookhaven: 2.62.6Brookhavenparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 416Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 9.51%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.3%Peak (2004)
  • 15Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890214122004: 99 filings (9.28/100 renter HHs)2007: 59 filings (5.70/100 renter HHs)2011: 81 filings (18.58/100 renter HHs)2012: 67 filings (15.37/100 renter HHs)2013: 49 filings (11.24/100 renter HHs)2014: 22 filings (5.05/100 renter HHs)2015: 24 filings (5.50/100 renter HHs)2016: 15 filings (5.34/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 85% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 75Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ashford Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ashford Park

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 9.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Brookhaven eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 416 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 9.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.3% of renter households in 2004.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021412

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021412?

Census tract 13089021412 in the Ashford Park neighborhood scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021412?

Median gross rent is $2,593/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021412?

1.4% of residents in tract 13089021412 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,812.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021412?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 11th, minority 32th, housing 2th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021412 considered part of Ashford Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021412 fall within Ashford Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021412?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 416 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021412 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.51% of renter households, peaking at 9.3% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021412 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021412 compare to Brookhaven overall?

Tract 13089021412 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Brookhaven at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brookhaven eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Brookhaven

Top eight tracts in Brookhaven ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related