Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Stone Mill Run Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tucker

Tract 13089021913 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,189 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Here is how census tract 13089021913, in the Stone Mill Run area of Tucker eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 7.4/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 4,189. That is riskier than roughly 98% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 75% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 45% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,293 monthly, set against $33,000 in average yearly household income, roughly 47% of income at the averages. Renters make up 91% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 68% Stable renters 23% Owners 9%
Tract context
Occupied units1,976
Renter share91.0%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate37.5%
Median income$33,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Stone Mill Run
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 18 tracts In Tucker
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#284 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucker and the region

Centroid at 33.8266, -84.1835 · click any tract to drill in

Why Stone Mill Run scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
37.5% poverty · this tract
9.4
Supply constraint
$1,293 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
7.3

How Stone Mill Run compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Stone Mill Run risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 021913Tucker: 2.82.8Tuckerparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 9,129Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 97.88%Avg annual filing rate
  • 207.1%Peak (2007)
  • 974Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890219132004: 1,110 filings (151.40/100 renter HHs)2007: 1,415 filings (207.09/100 renter HHs)2011: 1,100 filings (72.85/100 renter HHs)2012: 1,169 filings (77.42/100 renter HHs)2013: 971 filings (64.30/100 renter HHs)2014: 1,186 filings (78.54/100 renter HHs)2015: 1,204 filings (79.74/100 renter HHs)2016: 974 filings (51.70/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 5,415Total filings 2020-21
  • 71.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 109 filings (1,090.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 101 filings (1,010.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 63 filings (630.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 76 filings (760.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 155 filings (1,550.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 154 filings (1,540.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 79 filings (790.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 91 filings (910.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 72 filings (720.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 67 filings (670.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 89 filings (890.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 106 filings (1,060.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 80 filings (800.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 63 filings (630.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 119 filings (1,190.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 142 filings (1,420.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 96 filings (960.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 66 filings (660.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 121 filings (1,210.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 94 filings (940.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 83 filings (830.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 88 filings (880.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 68 filings (680.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 65 filings (650.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 85 filings (850.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 103 filings (1,030.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 97 filings (970.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 101 filings (1,010.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 125 filings (1,250.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 66 filings (660.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 146 filings (1,460.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 67 filings (670.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 55 filings (550.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 96 filings (960.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 106 filings (1,060.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 96 filings (960.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 101 filings (1,010.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 108 filings (1,080.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 72 filings (720.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 88 filings (880.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 93 filings (930.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 61 filings (610.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 63 filings (630.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 78 filings (780.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 51 filings (510.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 136 filings (1,360.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Stone Mill Run

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 9.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tucker eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 38.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 30.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021913

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021913?

Census tract 13089021913 in the Stone Mill Run neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021913?

Median gross rent is $1,293/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021913?

37.5% of residents in tract 13089021913 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,189.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021913?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 70th, minority 89th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021913 considered part of Stone Mill Run?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021913 fall within Stone Mill Run (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021913?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9,129 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021913 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 97.88% of renter households, peaking at 207.1% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021913 struggle to pay rent?

About 38.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 30.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021913 compare to Tucker overall?

Tract 13089021913 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Tucker at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucker

Top eight tracts in Tucker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related