Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally
Hunters Glen Eviction Risk: Lower , Pine Lake
Tract 13089022016 ·
DeKalb County, GA · pop 3,839 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
How risky is the Hunters Glen neighborhood of Pine Lake for landlords? Census tract 13089022016 scores 5.6/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 62% of US census tracts.
47% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,593 a month against an average household income of $71,101 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%Stable renters 15%Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units991
Renter share28.2%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate8.5%
Median income$71,101
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#4 of 4 tracts In Hunters Glen
Very Low
Within county
45th percentile
#113 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Moderate
Within state
43th percentile
#1,583 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
National
37th percentile
#53,267 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pine Lake and the region
Centroid at 33.8088, -84.2098 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hunters Glen scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pine Lake
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
8.5% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,593 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pine Lake
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pine Lake
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pine Lake
5.0
How Hunters Glen compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
82%Socioeconomic
96%Household composition
95%Racial/ethnic minority
46%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
593Total filings 2020-21
7.8Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hunters Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
19.9%Housing insecurity
12.4%Utility-shutoff threat
24.9%Food insecurity
19.6%SNAP enrollment
12.4%Transit barriers
15.0%No health insurance
17.1%Frequent mental distress
27.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hunters Glen
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pine Lake, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 19.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13089022016
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089022016?
Census tract 13089022016 in the Hunters Glen neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13089022016?
Median gross rent is $1,593/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13089022016?
8.5% of residents in tract 13089022016 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,839.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13089022016?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 96th, minority 95th, housing 46th.
Q5
Is tract 13089022016 considered part of Hunters Glen?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089022016 fall within Hunters Glen (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13089022016 struggle to pay rent?
About 19.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13089022016 compare to Pine Lake overall?
Tract 13089022016 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Pine Lake at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pine Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.