Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Hunters Glen Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pine Lake

Tract 13089021917 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,979 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Hunters Glen in Pine Lake anchors census tract 13089021917, which lands at 6.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 87% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 73% of renter households, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,304 monthly, set against $44,724 in average yearly household income, roughly 35% of income at the averages. Renters make up 67% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 49% Stable renters 18% Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units1,213
Renter share66.7%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate18.2%
Median income$44,724

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Hunters Glen
Elevated
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Pine Lake
Very High
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#56 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#1,094 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pine Lake and the region

Centroid at 33.7941, -84.2012 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hunters Glen scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
18.2% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,304 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pine Lake
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pine Lake
5.1

How Hunters Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hunters Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 021917Pine Lake: 2.72.7Pine Lakeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,661Total filings 2020-21
  • 35.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 51 filings (510.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 96 filings (960.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 80 filings (800.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 63 filings (630.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 65 filings (650.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 57 filings (570.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 95 filings (950.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hunters Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hunters Glen

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pine Lake, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 22.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021917

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021917?

Census tract 13089021917 in the Hunters Glen neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021917?

Median gross rent is $1,304/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021917?

18.2% of residents in tract 13089021917 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,979.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021917?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 62th, minority 91th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021917 considered part of Hunters Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021917 fall within Hunters Glen (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089021917 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089021917 compare to Pine Lake overall?

Tract 13089021917 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Pine Lake at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pine Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pine Lake

Top eight tracts in Pine Lake ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related