Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally
Frontier Forest Eviction Risk: Lower , Sugar Hill
Tract 13135050114 · Gwinnett County, GA · pop 2,775 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
The Moderate-tier score of 5.7/10 for census tract 13135050114 reflects conditions in the Frontier Forest neighborhood of Sugar Hill, Georgia. On the national scale it ranks #29,235 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 36% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,367 monthly, set against $80,291 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 19%
Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,012
Renter share29.4%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$80,291
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
75
th percentile
High
Within county
37
th percentile
Low
Within state
21
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Sugar Hill and the region
Centroid at 34.0945, -84.0260 · click any tract to drill in
Why Frontier Forest scores 2.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Sugar Hill
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,367 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Hill
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Hill
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Hill
6.7
How Frontier Forest compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 50
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 42%Socioeconomic
- 78%Household composition
- 58%Racial/ethnic minority
- 33%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 308Total filings 2020-21
- 4.1Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 14.3%Housing insecurity
- 8.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.6%Food insecurity
- 11.7%SNAP enrollment
- 8.7%Transit barriers
- 16.6%No health insurance
- 16.4%Frequent mental distress
- 28.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Frontier Forest
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sugar Hill eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 14.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13135050114
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050114?
Census tract 13135050114 in the Frontier Forest neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13135050114?
Median gross rent is $1,367/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050114?
5.6% of residents in tract 13135050114 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,775.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050114?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 78th, minority 58th, housing 33th.
Q5
Is tract 13135050114 considered part of Frontier Forest?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050114 fall within Frontier Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13135050114 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13135050114 compare to Sugar Hill overall?
Tract 13135050114 scores 2.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Sugar Hill at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Hill eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Hill
Top eight tracts in Sugar Hill ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · GA
The Oaks at Lanier
3.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · GA
The Oaks at Lanier
2.7
/ 10 · Low
Tract · GA
The Oaks at Lanier
1.7
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · GA
13135050119
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · GA
13135050120
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · GA
The Oaks at Lanier
1.3
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · GA
13135050239
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · GA
13135050116
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Related