Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally
Blackwood Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Lilburn
Tract 13135050463 · Gwinnett County, GA · pop 3,465 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Here is how census tract 13135050463, in the Blackwood Hills neighborhood of Lilburn, looks to a landlord: a 5.6/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,465. That is riskier than about 62% of US census tracts.
56% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,461 monthly, set against $41,318 in average yearly household income, roughly 42% of income at the averages. About 93% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 52%
Stable renters 41%
Owners 7%
Tract context
Occupied units1,795
Renter share93.4%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate11.6%
Median income$41,318
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
81
th percentile
High
Within state
52
th percentile
Moderate
National
45
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lilburn and the region
Centroid at 33.8763, -84.1979 · click any tract to drill in
Why Blackwood Hills scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lilburn
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
11.6% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,461 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lilburn
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lilburn
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lilburn
5.0
How Blackwood Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 54
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 8%Household composition
- 92%Racial/ethnic minority
- 21%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 2,712Total filings 2020-21
- 35.7Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Blackwood Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 32.9%Housing insecurity
- 21.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 40.8%Food insecurity
- 36.5%SNAP enrollment
- 20.7%Transit barriers
- 30.3%No health insurance
- 21.6%Frequent mental distress
- 36.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Blackwood Hills
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lilburn, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 54th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 32.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 21.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13135050463
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050463?
Census tract 13135050463 in the Blackwood Hills neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13135050463?
Median gross rent is $1,461/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050463?
11.6% of residents in tract 13135050463 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,465.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050463?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 8th, minority 92th, housing 21th.
Q5
Is tract 13135050463 considered part of Blackwood Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050463 fall within Blackwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13135050463 struggle to pay rent?
About 32.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13135050463 compare to Lilburn overall?
Tract 13135050463 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Lilburn at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lilburn; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related