Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Rose Hill Heights Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 13215000800 · Muscogee County, GA · pop 2,535 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 13215000800 sits in the Rose Hill Heights area of Columbus eviction risk, GA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5/10. It is home to 2,535 residents. SNAP participation runs 36.6% against 15.2% nationally.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 30% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,124
Renter share48.9%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate34.5%
Median income$49,811

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rose Hill Heights
Moderate
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 59 tracts In Columbus
Very High
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 59 tracts In Muscogee County
Elevated
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#681 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 32.4984, -84.9706 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rose Hill Heights scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
34.5% poverty · this tract
8.6
Supply constraint
$883 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
3.0

How Rose Hill Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rose Hill Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.0This tracttract 0008003.6Columbusparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 68

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill Heights

The severe-burden share is 28%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

The poverty rate is 35%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 8.6/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10.

Average gross rent is $883, 20% below the Columbus average. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 19.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Against Muscogee County at 44.6%, 39% of renters here are cost-burdened.

It sits 0.9 points above the Muscogee County average of 4.1. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Columbus. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #32,842 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $49,811.

49% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13215000800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13215000800?

Census tract 13215000800 in the Rose Hill Heights neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13215000800?

Median gross rent is $883/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13215000800?

34.5% of residents in tract 13215000800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,535.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13215000800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 55th, minority 73th, housing 45th.
Q5

Is tract 13215000800 considered part of Rose Hill Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13215000800 fall within Rose Hill Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13215000800 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13215000800 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 13215000800 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 13215000800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 11% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related