Rose Hill Eviction Risk: Elevated , Columbus
Tract 13215001400 · Muscogee County, GA · pop 2,059 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
In Rose Hill in Columbus, census tract 13215001400 scores 5.7/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 65% of US census tracts.
About 61% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $699 monthly, set against $17,295 in average yearly household income, roughly 48% of income at the averages. Renters make up 85% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Columbus and the region
Centroid at 32.4889, -84.9787 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rose Hill scores 6.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Rose Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 97%Socioeconomic
- 98%Household composition
- 84%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 65%Grade C
- 28%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 33.7%Housing insecurity
- 29.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 47.8%Food insecurity
- 53.5%SNAP enrollment
- 25.7%Transit barriers
- 21.8%No health insurance
- 24.4%Frequent mental distress
- 49.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill
The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Columbus eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Muscogee County average of 5.0 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Part of this tract, about 28% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
In CDC survey modeling, about 33.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 29.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 13215001400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13215001400?
What is the average rent in tract 13215001400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 13215001400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 13215001400?
Is tract 13215001400 considered part of Rose Hill?
What share of households in tract 13215001400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 13215001400 compare to Columbus overall?
Was tract 13215001400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Columbus
Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.