Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Rose Hill Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 13215001400 · Muscogee County, GA · pop 2,059 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 5/10, tract 13215001400 in the Rose Hill area of Columbus, GA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,059. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 52% Stable renters 33% Owners 15%
Tract context
Occupied units1,002
Renter share85.0%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate56.4%
Median income$17,295

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rose Hill
Moderate
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#18 of 59 tracts In Columbus
Elevated
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 59 tracts In Muscogee County
Elevated
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#681 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 32.4889, -84.9787 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rose Hill scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
56.4% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$699 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
3.0

How Rose Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rose Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.0This tracttract 0014003.6Columbusparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill

Cost burden runs 61% here against 44.6% across Muscogee County. 34% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

The poverty rate is 56%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Annualized rent equals 48% of average household income of $17,295, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Average gross rent is $699, 37% below the Columbus average. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 29.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. 85% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Disability prevalence runs 49.9% against 31.5% nationally. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.3/10.

It sits 0.9 points above the Muscogee County average of 4.1. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Columbus. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13215001400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13215001400?

Census tract 13215001400 in the Rose Hill neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13215001400?

Median gross rent is $699/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13215001400?

56.4% of residents in tract 13215001400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,059.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13215001400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 98th, minority 84th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 13215001400 considered part of Rose Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13215001400 fall within Rose Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13215001400 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 29.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13215001400 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 13215001400 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 13215001400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 28% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related